L.A.D. AFFIRMATIONS
"The Gems of Life-After-Death Research"
Support for the concept of Life-After-Death, goes hand-in-hand with the concept of Post-Materialist Idealism.
Post-Materialism is an 'expanded science' which accounts for key anomalous phenomenon which Materialist science denies,
and which clearly indicate a Uni-verse of true unity, bonded through Entanglement and other Quantum Laws.
Survival demands the primacy of consciousness over matter--- of immaterial mind over physical brain.
What follows is a collection of key anomalae supporting the Survival of Consciousness,
including the main pioneers in current Post-Materialist research.
The Post-Materialist Manifesto can be read below:
http://opensciences.org/
Post-Materialism is an 'expanded science' which accounts for key anomalous phenomenon which Materialist science denies,
and which clearly indicate a Uni-verse of true unity, bonded through Entanglement and other Quantum Laws.
Survival demands the primacy of consciousness over matter--- of immaterial mind over physical brain.
What follows is a collection of key anomalae supporting the Survival of Consciousness,
including the main pioneers in current Post-Materialist research.
The Post-Materialist Manifesto can be read below:
http://opensciences.org/
|
| ||||
The SIGNIFICANCE of ROGUE PHENOMENON
Anomalae which defies scientific explanation and lies outside its current paradigm,
is often called 'Rogue Phenomenon.' Materialist science generally overlooks it as an insignificant glitch.
The actual strength of rogue phenomenon, however, lies in the total sum of all its aspects taken as a whole.
Survival evidence, for example, is greater 'in summa,' than in any of its many individual lines of manifestation;
the idea being, that conclusive evidence can only be seen within the context of whole, unbroken data.
"…it is the convergence-of-evidence from different sources or domains,
called 'consilience of inductions' in science, that ultimately moves
scientific understanding forward."
--- Dr. Michael Shermer
Scientific understanding is revealed by observing the Integrated Pattern, then asking, "why?"
William James called this approach, 'Integrated Psychophysics,' and pointed out that
only one flawless example of any single Rogue Phenomenon is needed
to conclusively establish the Validity of its existence.
The 'White Crow' principle was hatched.
The SMOKING GUNS of survival research:
REINCARNATION STUDIES |
QUANTUM PHYSICS |
NEAR-DEATH STUDIES |
POST-MATERIALISM
ENTITIES |
YOU ARE NOT YOUR BRAIN |
Other Supporting Rogue Phenomenon:
|
SYNCHRONICITY |
Miracles |
IMPORTANT SURVIVAL BOOKS
click below for download page
IMPORTANT SURVIVAL DOCUMENTS
click below for download page
IDEALISM & SURVIVAL:
"Bernardo Kastrup's Metaphysical Speculations"
(click on pic above for more)
|
|
|
|
KEY WEBSITES:
http://www.victorzammit.com/
http://iands.org/home.html
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/summary_of_evidence
http://www.near-death.com/evidence.html
http://www.near-death.com/
http://www.deathandafter.com/links/index.html
http://www.psychomanteum.com/books/drmoody.htm
http://adcguides.com/dvmediumship.htm
http://www.ascsi.org/
http://wichm.home.xs4all.nl/paraps.html
http://www.zerdinphenomenal.co.uk/
http://mikepettigrew.com/afterlife/index.html
http://www.mikepettigrew.com/afterlife/html/evp___itc.html
http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Global/Omega/
http://www.survivalafterdeath.info/
http://www.thescoleexperiment.com/
http://www.ebenalexander.com/
http://www.quantumphil.org/index.htm
http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinical/departments/psychiatry/sections/cspp/dops
http://userpages.umbc.edu/~braude/
http://www.transcommunication.org/
http://www.victorzammit.com/
http://iands.org/home.html
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/summary_of_evidence
http://www.near-death.com/evidence.html
http://www.near-death.com/
http://www.deathandafter.com/links/index.html
http://www.psychomanteum.com/books/drmoody.htm
http://adcguides.com/dvmediumship.htm
http://www.ascsi.org/
http://wichm.home.xs4all.nl/paraps.html
http://www.zerdinphenomenal.co.uk/
http://mikepettigrew.com/afterlife/index.html
http://www.mikepettigrew.com/afterlife/html/evp___itc.html
http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Global/Omega/
http://www.survivalafterdeath.info/
http://www.thescoleexperiment.com/
http://www.ebenalexander.com/
http://www.quantumphil.org/index.htm
http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinical/departments/psychiatry/sections/cspp/dops
http://userpages.umbc.edu/~braude/
http://www.transcommunication.org/
Braude argues that all the various strands of evidence mutually reinforce one another in pointing toward the conclusion that ‘we, or some essential purposeful and distinctive chunk of our personal psychology, can survive physical death.'
This conclusion is arrived at with ‘little assurance’, but ‘some justification.’ And the data place further limits on what we can reasonably infer from them: only that some people may survive death, for a limited time.
The plausibility of the survival of some aspect of personal consciousness after the physical destruction of the body, depends to a very great extent on the solution to the so called mind/ body or mind/brain problem.
However, it is essential to realize that the findings of neural science only point to a correlation between brain and mind activity. And correlation does not necessarily imply causation. There exists a strong correlation between amount of sun screen lotions consumed and the number of deaths by drowning. This does not imply that these lotions cause people to drown, does it?
That there exists a close relationship between mind and brain is without doubt. The crucial question concerns the nature of this relationship, and more generally the ultimate nature of consciousness. This is, by almost universal admission, possibly the most difficult problem confronting both science and philosophy.
This conclusion is arrived at with ‘little assurance’, but ‘some justification.’ And the data place further limits on what we can reasonably infer from them: only that some people may survive death, for a limited time.
The plausibility of the survival of some aspect of personal consciousness after the physical destruction of the body, depends to a very great extent on the solution to the so called mind/ body or mind/brain problem.
However, it is essential to realize that the findings of neural science only point to a correlation between brain and mind activity. And correlation does not necessarily imply causation. There exists a strong correlation between amount of sun screen lotions consumed and the number of deaths by drowning. This does not imply that these lotions cause people to drown, does it?
That there exists a close relationship between mind and brain is without doubt. The crucial question concerns the nature of this relationship, and more generally the ultimate nature of consciousness. This is, by almost universal admission, possibly the most difficult problem confronting both science and philosophy.